Forensic delay analysis · Switzerland-based · Private pre-launch

Forensic delay analysis · Switzerland-based

Build the delay analysis from the evidence up.

Build the delay analysis from the evidence up.

Build the delay analysis from the evidence up.

Exhibit29 reconstructs chronology and causal chains in construction delay disputes, from the documentary record and from the baseline and as-built schedule.

Split Exhibit 29 workspace with a qualified answer beside the cited source document

01

The problem

A delay dispute is won or weakened in the factual chain.

Schedules, correspondence, minutes and site records describe the same events in different ways. Reconstructing causation by hand consumes senior time and leaves the weakest links hardest to defend.

Reconstruction costs time, money and coverage

Reconciling dates, versions and sources by hand takes weeks of chargeable time, and the full record is difficult to review consistently under matter deadlines.

Decisions land before the record does

Settlement and strategy calls are often made while the chronology is still being assembled.

Unsupported steps become attack points

A persuasive conclusion is only as strong as the factual steps that connect it to the record.

02

What the software does

One record. One reviewable chain.

Exhibit29 keeps source facts, proposed links and expert decisions distinct, so the route from evidence to finding stays visible. It turns fragmented project records into an expert-ready case foundation: chronology, causal chains, contrary evidence, proof gaps and source trails.

Source

Convert schedules, correspondence and site records into meaningful data points.

Source

Convert schedules, correspondence and site records into meaningful data points.

Link

Identify the physical, administrative and project-governance constraints that link those data points, and the time-related drift they translate into.

Link

Identify the physical, administrative and project-governance constraints that link those data points, and the time-related drift they translate into.

Causation

Separate the direct cause from the ultimate root cause, and both from the knock-on effects.

Causation

Separate the direct cause from the ultimate root cause, and both from the knock-on effects.

Review

Candidate links tested against supporting, contrary and missing evidence.

Expert decision

Method, attribution, limitations and findings recorded as explicit decisions.

Expert decision

Method, attribution, limitations and findings recorded as explicit decisions.

Grounded Exhibit 29 answer with reasoning stages, dates and source citations

Supported technologies

  • Microsoft Outlook logo
  • Microsoft Excel logo
  • Microsoft Word logo
  • Microsoft Project logo
  • Adobe Acrobat logo
  • Oracle Primavera logo
  • Microsoft Outlook logo
  • Microsoft Excel logo
  • Microsoft Word logo
  • Microsoft Project logo
  • Adobe Acrobat logo
  • Oracle Primavera logo

* Trademarks belong to their respective owners. No affiliation or endorsement is implied.

03

Workflow

Four steps. Expert-controlled throughout.

01

Ingest

Process schedules, correspondence, reports and structured files in one matter.

02

Reconstruct

Choose your source of truth: baseline, as-built dates and critical path. Then build a source-linked chronology and candidate causal chains.

03

Test

Compare planned and as-built sequence, account for criticality, and surface alternatives, gaps and contrary evidence.

04

Decide

The expert selects the methodology and records decisions and findings. The software assists but does not form the opinion.

04

Evidence and provenance

Every factual claim keeps a route back to its source.

Each data point cited can be opened: page, paragraph, cell or schedule activity relied upon. Key information stays readily available everywhere for quick review.

Evidence trail: source, location and limitations.

Exhibit 29 causal trace linking late access to critical-path movement and downstream consequences

05

Disclosure

Where we stand.

Exhibit29 is in private pre-launch, opening first to selected forensic delay practices.

Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Data date
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Data date

Swiss data residency and infrastructure

Exhibit29 is based in Geneva. Client instances are isolated and production project data is designed to remain in Switzerland.

Private pre-launch

Opening first to selected forensic delay practices.

06

Briefing

Request a demo.

We are opening Exhibit29 to a small number of forensic delay practices. Tell us how you work and we will arrange a private product briefing.